<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Testing Wave in WordPress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.thearetical.com/2009/10/25/wave-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.thearetical.com/2009/10/25/wave-test/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:12:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eldon Schneider</title>
		<link>http://blog.thearetical.com/2009/10/25/wave-test/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Eldon Schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thearetical.com/?p=246#comment-67</guid>
		<description>It seems you quite have had a hard time dealing with google wave? Or not. I&#039;m just curious if the same principle is applied with the wave extensions featured in firefox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems you quite have had a hard time dealing with google wave? Or not. I&#8217;m just curious if the same principle is applied with the wave extensions featured in firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://blog.thearetical.com/2009/10/25/wave-test/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thearetical.com/?p=246#comment-62</guid>
		<description>hello,
well i have a wordpress account (and recently wordpress plugin ) and would like to know how u got a wave in wordpress blog. I&#039;ve read the &#039;read me&#039; file when u download wavr and the information on the page where u download it and i am completely lost.lol. i&#039;ve never worked with API or if i did i&#039;ve never realized it. and while i dont mind playing around with something until i get it, some of the terminology and lack of any experience on my part is annoying me .So, only if u have time, if u could give me a step by step help that would be amazing. FYI i have the preview wave and i already have bloggy (though i dont know how to use it). Thanks!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello,<br />
well i have a wordpress account (and recently wordpress plugin ) and would like to know how u got a wave in wordpress blog. I&#8217;ve read the &#8216;read me&#8217; file when u download wavr and the information on the page where u download it and i am completely lost.lol. i&#8217;ve never worked with API or if i did i&#8217;ve never realized it. and while i dont mind playing around with something until i get it, some of the terminology and lack of any experience on my part is annoying me .So, only if u have time, if u could give me a step by step help that would be amazing. FYI i have the preview wave and i already have bloggy (though i dont know how to use it). Thanks!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HaiColon</title>
		<link>http://blog.thearetical.com/2009/10/25/wave-test/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>HaiColon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thearetical.com/?p=246#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Normally a user would be able to see an embedded wave without having a Google Wave account. The only reason why this is not true right now is because Wave is still in preview.

At the moment making a wave public means everyone can edit it like you said, but that&#039;s also just temporary. Google plans to add access control features to Wave so that you can control who can read and write. They mention that in nearly every official wave they write so it&#039;s just a matter of time. They do have trouble with people editing their waves themselfs so it should be a priority :)

As for CountColon not updating statistics automatically after an edit.. I just uploaded version 0.4.0 which does just that :) It doesn&#039;t work for commands you used before this update so you will have to replace the statistics with the [count: words,lines,chars,paras] command one more time. But then you will never have to do it again ^^ Unless you want to change what&#039;s being displayed, then you can just swap the statistics with a new command.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Normally a user would be able to see an embedded wave without having a Google Wave account. The only reason why this is not true right now is because Wave is still in preview.</p>
<p>At the moment making a wave public means everyone can edit it like you said, but that&#8217;s also just temporary. Google plans to add access control features to Wave so that you can control who can read and write. They mention that in nearly every official wave they write so it&#8217;s just a matter of time. They do have trouble with people editing their waves themselfs so it should be a priority :)</p>
<p>As for CountColon not updating statistics automatically after an edit.. I just uploaded version 0.4.0 which does just that :) It doesn&#8217;t work for commands you used before this update so you will have to replace the statistics with the [count: words,lines,chars,paras] command one more time. But then you will never have to do it again ^^ Unless you want to change what&#8217;s being displayed, then you can just swap the statistics with a new command.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
